GonzoGeek vs. The Oscars 2010: Best Actress

GonzoGeek vs. The Oscars 2010

The 82nd Annual Academy Awards are just three weeks away, and between now and then, your GonzoGeek panel will be making their picks alongside our resident Oscar expert: Matt’s copy of “Wrestlemania 2000” for the Nintendo 64. 

Today: Best Actress 

  

Sandra Bullock for "The Blind Side" - 2/5
Helen Mirren for "The Last Station" - 25/1
Carey Milligan for "An Education" - 7/1
Gabourey Sidibe for "Precious" - 10/1
Meryl Streep for "Julie & Julia" - 7/4

Bruce (last year: 2/5) 

Wow, they really stacked this one in Sandra Bullock’s favor didn’t they? Too bad I haven’t seen and don’t like the premise of The Blind Side. When I heard Michael Oher, the kid the movie is about, say they dumbed his character down, I found that offensive. Nearly as offensive as Bullock trying to pull off a Southern accent. Bad move Sandy. Two first time nominees are in this field. Both gave, what I’ve read, are excellent performances in good movies. Too bad for them. Helen Mirren won’t win for a movie nobody between the coasts has seen. That leaves us with Meryl Streep playing Julia Child. Well, since I think she’s the only one who has a chance of stopping Sandra Bullock, I guess I’m going with Meryl. I’m doing it as much for Dan Akroyd’s bleeding out Julia Child as anything. Bon Appetit! 

Chris (last year: 3/5) 

Sandra Bullock is on the right path. But it’s not her time yet. So we’re probably looking at either Sidibe or Streep. It shouldn’t matter, but Streep has been so good for so long her performance in this role probably won’t but her over. Even more to the point, however, everything about ‘Precious’ screams of a big, steamy lovefest with Oscar, and Gabourey Sidibe will probably get her taste before he’s spent. 

Chuck (last year: n/a) 

Carey Mulligan for ‘An Education’: Her portrayal of Jenny in this, just her third or fourth film appearance, should turn this relative unknown into one of our next high-profile leading ladies. Her personal story about her early forays into acting is as “Education”-al as anything she’s committed to the screen thus far- but she is only 24, and has much ahead of her. I’d expect Nick Hornby to take the Best Adapted Screenplay trophy if not up against Geoffrey Fletcher’s adaptation of Sapphire’s ‘Push’, but Hornby will be back, as will the lovely Ms. Mulligan. 

John (last year: 2/5) 

I’ve only seen two of the nominees, but one of them was Meryl Streep. Hard to go against Streep in any award race, and I actually liked her in this–even though this movie was marketed to the polar opposite of my demographic. I do like a good meal, though, so there’s that. 

Matt (last year: 3/5) 

Count me among the many who don’t understand the Bullock nod.  I didn’t hate The Blind Side as much as RJ did (and I had loooow expectactions), but her performance was hardly stunning.  Plus, for all the talk of “body of work”, surely Bullock’s resume would cost her the statue, not earn it.  I could see an upset by one of the newcomers, but Sidibe’s great performance  is overshadowed by Mo’Nique, leaving it up to Mulligan.  Instead, I think this is a “make good” award – in weak year for leading ladies, voters will turn to an old standby and give it to Meryl Streep, whose turn in last year’s “Doubt” was head-and-shoulders above “Julie & Julia” and should have won instead of illiterate Nazi pedohphile Kate Winslet.  

R.J. (last year: n/a) 

Conventional wisdom seems to be leaning toward Sandra Bullock in one of the worst films ever to be nominated from an Academy Award. More on that in a moment. Helen Mirren, in “The Last Station,” gets nominated for a film only awards voters and critics have seen and will not win. Carrey Mulligan, a twenty-four year old actor, plays a teenager who grows up swiftly during one pivotal year of her schooling in “An Education.” She’s very good as are Gabourey Sidibe in “Precious” and Meryl Streep in “Julie & Julia.” But this year seems to belong to Bullock. Oscar voting often follows the PR which is driven by money and hustle and Bullock’s PR team in this Oscar season has been amazing. Sandra Bullock will win for a film that insults the intelligence of all audiences and made a fortune by doing so. 

Wrestlemania 2000 (last year: 2/5)* 

Surprisingly, Mirren has the longest odds, so she’s out. 

Bullock: “Double J” Jeff Jarrett
Sidibe: Mark Henry
Mulligan: X-Pac
Streep:  Mr. McMahon 

Streep gets double- and triple-teamed from the start.  She fights back against the odds, delivering a piledriver to Sidibe on the concrete floor, then returning to the ring to eliminate Mulligan after a crippling back rake at 3:53.  Sidibe recovers and bloodies Bullock, but Streep rejoins the fray to team up with Sandra and deliver a pair of double-team atomic drops to Sidibe.  Then Meryl turns on her new ally just as quickly, surprising her with a shoulderblock to the back and eliminating Bullock at 7:01.  The larger Sidibe batters a weary Streep, delivering SEVEN Big Splashes over the course of two minutes.  Ever the crafty veteran, Streep catches Sidibe with a low blow and goes for another piledriver, but Gabourey Sidibe reverses it into a back body drop, delivers an eighth Big Splash and wins the Oscar at 9:35.

Odds were chosen from various online betting sites, including Bodog and Bet365. Kids, remember that gambling is illegal in many states and maybe your friends at the horse track never thought to mention that the place had mob ties and it’s very difficult to explain to the family why your “old college pals” Guido and Antonio keep showing up at the house every weekend to ‘hang out’ but end up leaving after fifteen to twenty minutes of ‘roughhousing’ the way you guys used to do it at marching band practice.  

Up next: Best Supporting Actor. 

* Wrestlemania 2000 picks the Oscars by (1) eliminating the nominee with the longest odds, (2) matching up the remaining four with a character from WM2K’s extensive circa-1997 WWF roster and (3) Staging a CPU-generated four-man elimination match where the last man standing is the Oscar winner. No wrestlers are repeated during the contest. 

7 thoughts on “GonzoGeek vs. The Oscars 2010: Best Actress

Add yours

  1. Matt (last year 3/5) : LOL!! You were very funny when you wrote “illiterate Nazi pedophile” (Winslet character: Reader) wondering how could that character have won over the formidable nun (Streep character: Doubt) !! But I enjoyed your description of the Reader character.

    Bty, I trust that Oscars is not an idiot enterprise as to give Bullock the best actress trophy. Listen people: the only reason Bullock is nominated is due to dearth of Oscar-worthy roles for women this year.

  2. I’ve got to say the ‘body of work’ arguement doesn’t hold water for me with regard to Bullock.

    The Net?
    Ms. Congeniality 2?
    All About Steve?
    Hope Floats?
    The Lake House?
    Two Weeks Notice?

    That’s a body fo work to be proud of?

    I suppose the checks cash, but proud?

    Not so much.

  3. I believe that this year’s Oscar for best attirce must go to Meryl Streep.Sandra Bollock has done a good job this year but not yet his time.
    To win an Oscar should not do a good job only one year but always done a good job so Meryl Streep deserves this award.
    Meryl has done a great job with Julie & Julia and the academy should not only reward a drama movie, it would be wrong not to give her this award.

    1. I don’t think this, or any other award not labeled ‘Lifetime’, is for doing a good job year in and year out. It is for best performance. Period.

      I do agree, however, that it will probably go to Meryl, and I don’t have a problem with that. Sandra Bullock’s accent in the trailers for ‘The Blind Side’ drove me up a wall, and the movie was a little too feel-goody. I’ve seen Michael Oher in interviews. No way he gets to the NFL as a first round pick as dumb as he’s portrayed.

      As for rewarding drama movies…well, if it was the consensus ‘best movie’ then by all means, toss it the Ocsar. Otherwise, I don’t think any one genre should be given any more weight than another, except ‘student films’ and most of them should be thrown away.

  4. I don’t have much love for “Gladiator” either. I couldn’t tell what was going on in many of the action scenes.

    Let me pull up a list of the past Best Picture winners and make a pick. Lots of critics say 1952’s “The Greatest Show on Earth” is the worst, but I’ve never seen it. There seems to be a lot of critical loathing for “Around the World in Eighty Days” in ’56 as well, but I’ve not seen that one either. I think “Slumdog Millionaire” is one of the worst winners and “Chocolat” one of the worst nominees. “The Blind Side” may be the absolute worst nominee, however.

    The year “Titanic” beat “LA Confidential” is the year I turned against the Academy Awards.

  5. Yo R.J., I’m compelled to throw in my own pet as the worst film to actually WIN a best picture Oscar….’Gladiator.’

    At the time I think I said something like, ‘why didn’t ‘Top Gun’ get it the year it was out?’

    I’d be curious to know your ‘worst winner ever.’

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: